WHEN TOO MUCH MONEY IS A BAD THING: THE RIPPLE EFFECTS OF ASSET BUBBLES

Mar 09, 2023

"When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done." - John Maynard Keynes

 

John Maynard Keynes warned about the risks of investing in things that might not work out and not investing enough in industries that make useful things. In this article, you'll discover the historical precedent that has been set when money gets injected too quickly into the economy.

 

Keynes thought that greed for quick profits often drives people to engage in speculation instead of focusing on long-term growth and stability. He warned that this kind of behavior could cause financial instability and bubbles in the market, as investors become overly optimistic about their returns.

 

This type of speculation can occur when money is injected into the economy too quickly. When the money supply grows too quickly, it can lead to asset bubbles and financial instability, as seen in several examples from US history.

 

The Roaring Twenties and the Stock Market Crash of 1929

One of the most famous examples of excessive money supply growth leading to an asset bubble and financial crisis is the stock market crash of 1929. In the 1920s, the US economy was booming, with a surge in industrial production and consumer spending. The Federal Reserve, the central bank of the US, pursued a loose monetary policy during this time, keeping interest rates low and increasing the money supply to stimulate economic growth.

 

This loose monetary policy helped fuel a stock market bubble, as investors poured money into the market in the hopes of making quick profits. Stock prices soared to unsustainable levels, and many companies that were not profitable on paper saw their stock prices rise sharply.

 

However, in October 1929, the stock market crashed, wiping out many investors' fortunes and leading to a prolonged economic downturn known as the Great Depression. The bursting of the stock market bubble contributed to the severity of the Depression, which lasted for over a decade and caused widespread unemployment and hardship.

 

The Dot-Com Bubble of the Late 1990s and Early 2000s

Another example of excessive money supply growth creating an asset bubble and financial instability is the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s and early 2000s. During this time, the internet was emerging as a powerful force in the economy, and many investors saw huge potential in internet-related stocks.

 

The Federal Reserve once again pursued a loose monetary policy during this time, keeping interest rates low and increasing the money supply to promote economic growth. This policy helped fuel a stock market bubble, as investors poured money into internet-related companies regardless of their actual profitability.

 

However, in the early 2000s, the dot-com bubble burst, and many of these companies went bankrupt. The burst of the bubble led to a mild recession and highlighted the dangers of excessive speculation and loose monetary policy.

 

The Housing Market Boom and Subsequent Financial Crisis of the 2000s

Perhaps the most recent example of excessive money supply growth creating an asset bubble and financial instability is the housing market boom of the 2000s. During this time, there was a surge in demand for housing and mortgages, and many people who could not previously afford homes were able to take out loans.

 

The Federal Reserve once again pursued a loose monetary policy during this time, keeping interest rates low and increasing the money supply to promote economic growth. This policy helped fuel a housing market bubble, as banks and other lenders made risky loans to people who could not afford them.

 

However, in 2007 and 2008, the housing market bubble burst, leading to a financial crisis that had global implications. Many of the loans made during the housing market boom went into default, leading to a wave of foreclosures and bankruptcies. The financial system itself was also severely affected, as many banks and other financial institutions held large amounts of toxic mortgage debt.

 

Bear Market Rallies

It's important to keep in mind that during these bear markets there were significant movements that looked like maybe the bear market was ending. There were five separate bear market rallies that were selling opportunities during the 1929-32 decline.  [1]

 

  • After the stock market crash in November 1929, the stock market went up by 47% from the lows in November to the highs in March 1930. But then the market went down again, by almost 46%, from that secondary peak.
  • Another rally started in December 1930 and ended in March 1931, with a gain of almost 24%. But then the market declined by 38% into June 1931.
  • The third rally was very short, but stocks went up by 29% until July 1931. Then another major sell-off brought stocks down by 45% into October 1931.
  • During the fourth rally, stocks gained 38% until November. But then they went down again by 42% until January 1932.
  • The fifth and final rally moved stocks up by 32% until May 1932. But from that point, the stock market declined again until July 1932, with the DJIA down 55%.

 

When the dot-com bubble began to burst around March of 2000, the market (particularly the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index) declined for over two years before entering bull territory in late 2002. Over the course of this bear market, the Nasdaq Composite saw eight rallies of 15% or more, and the S&P 500 saw eight rallies of 5% or more before the market eventually reached its true bottom in the summer of 2002.

 

Starting in October 2007 and ending in March 2009, there was a bear market because of problems with subprime mortgages. During these 17 months, the S&P went down by around 57%, but it didn't go down all at once. There were 12 times when the market went up by 5% to 24% even though it was still a bear market. Finally, the market hit its real lowest point. [2]

 

Conclusion

The duration of asset bubbles varies, and it's difficult to give a specific time frame. However, in general, asset bubbles tend to last until the market realizes that asset prices have become detached from their underlying fundamentals. When this happens, investors begin to sell off their holdings, causing prices to drop sharply.

 

In conclusion, there are a lot of parallels between these three examples from US history and the current markets and economy. The large sums of money that were quickly injected into the economy following the months of the COVID lockdowns seemed to lead to large amounts of speculation into higher risk investments as interest rates remained low. Essentially setting the stage for a difficult bear market. 

 

Unfortunately, there is not a crystal ball to what will come next. Yet, these three examples demonstrate the dangers of what can follow when high amounts of cash get injected into an economy with low interest rates. In each case, the Federal Reserve pursued policies designed to promote economic growth, but these policies also created asset bubbles and financial instability. The bursting of these bubbles led to economic downturns and had far-reaching consequences for the broader economy. 

 

In spite of the aggressive increase of interest rates, the FED's most recent comments suggest that there is a long way to go in this fight against inflation. Essentially, the only way to bring inflation down is to decrease the amount of demand for goods and services. With a basic understanding of economics, you know that the price of a good or service will go down when demand goes down. 

 

Essentially, the way to reduce demand is by reducing the amount of money that is available to be used on goods and services. One way this happens is by increasing interest rates because borrowing money at higher interest rates is less attractive. Another way money supply gets suppressed is through an increase of unemployment because people can’t spend money that they don’t earn. 

 

In our estimation, there will most likely be a domino effect. If the FED continues to increase interest rates it should naturally decrease demand for goods and services. As demand falls businesses will have a fall off in revenue and look to cut costs. Employees are usually the largest cost in a business. So, if this happens, we should expect to see an increase of unemployment in the coming months. 

 

At Abundance, our goal is to create an investment product that is adaptable to any market conditions. If the recent market gains are a "bear rally" we want to avoid chasing gains and be positioned for success over the long term. 

 

Sources: 

[1] https://us.tradezero.co/blog/the-bear-growls-for-thursday-the-1929-1932-model-90-year-cycle/783/

[2] https://www.thestreet.com/dictionary/b/bear-market-rally

By Tom Hermann (Chief Investment Officer) 14 Jul, 2023
The financial landscape is evolving rapidly, and central banks worldwide are embracing the concept of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) as a means to modernize their monetary systems. CBDCs are digital currencies issued by central banks with their value linked to the issuing country’s official currency. The idea of CBDCs is gaining traction globally, with 87 countries actively exploring their implementation [1] . These 87 countries represent over 90 percent of global GDP. In this week's update we will delve deeper into how CBDCs will work, their benefits, and the unnerving risks they present to privacy and freedom. How Will CBDCs Work? In theory, CBDCs have the potential to digitize and replace physical currency. They are digital representations of a country's official currency, and will be issued and regulated by that country's central bank. The main goal for digitizing traditional money is to make it more accessible, efficient, and secure. The emergence of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and the growing importance of digital payments have propelled the exploration of CBDCs as a modern financial tool. CBDCs have the potential to revolutionize financial transactions by streamlining processes and reducing costs. In the current financial system, each bank operates its own payment tracking system, resulting in delays and inefficiencies when multiple banks are involved in a transaction [2] . However, since CBDCs would be handled by the central bank it would allow for all the transactions to be consolidated onto a single ledger, enabling instant clearing of payments and universal acceptance, regardless of the payment method or platform used [2] . Ultimately, if this idea comes to fruition, it will eliminate the need for banks that are not the central bank. Benefits of CBDCs CBDCs would require a complete overhaul of the financial system. Therefore, CBDCs must offer several significant advantages to justify that type of overhaul. Here are the some of the most prominent benefits for CBDCs: Reduced Costs - One key benefit is the potential for reduced costs. By shifting focus from physical infrastructure to digital finance, financial-service providers could save an estimated $400 billion annually in direct costs [3] . Increase speed - CBDCs have the capacity to enhance the speed and efficiency of electronic payment systems, benefiting both individuals and businesses. Appeal to the unbanked - CBDCs offer a solution for people who do not have access to a bank account. According to a survey from 2016, 1.6 billion people around the world did not have a bank account. Another statistic shows that less than 5% of adults do not have a bank account [3] . CBDCs have the potential to increase financial inclusion, empowering those without bank accounts, but adoption isn’t a guarantee as many underbanked people may favor the total anonymity that comes with using cash. Heightened Security - This is a byproduct of the speed and single bank ledger. Private key cryptography could be implemented for users to "sign off" on transactions digitally, and they would become finalized and unalterable in a short period of time [3] . Risks and Concerns While CBDCs offer numerous benefits, they also come with risks and concerns that must be carefully addressed. One major concern is the potential for increased governmental control. Although no central bank currently plans to restrict CBDC usage, the hypothetical possibility of the government deciding which purchases are permissible raises privacy and individual freedom concerns. Additionally, the traceability of digital currency may lead to increased taxation, as every transaction becomes easily traceable. Technological stability is another challenge, as evidenced by the temporary shutdown of the digital version of Eastern Caribbean DCash due to technical issues [4] . Let's take a moment to go more in depth on the potential for governmental control. The following is a quote from professor Eswar Prasad. Prasad is a professor at Cornell University and the author of The Future of Money: How the Digital Revolution Is Transforming Currencies and Finance. Prasad made this statement while speaking at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting of the new champions. “You could have, as I argue in my book, potentially better and some people might see a darker world, where the government decides that unit, so central bank money can be used to purchase some things but not other things that are deemed less desirable, like, say, ammunition or drugs or pornography or something of the sort. And that is very powerful in terms of the use of a CBDC and I think also extremely dangerous for central banks” [5] Prasad noted that he was only speaking hypothetically and said, “No central bank is contemplating any such uses for its CBDC but, as an academic, it is important for me to point out all the possibilities and potential—both good and bad—of a world in which all payments are digital and anonymity might be limited (relative to the use of cash).” [5] This is possible because CBDCs are programmable. For example, a CBDC could be programmable where it can only be used for certain items or even have an expiration date – which would ultimately force spending. This allows for CBDCs to make it much easier for a centralized authority to dictate and control human behavior because they can restrict the flow and opportunities if you are not behaving in a manner that they're requesting. This is very evident in China's social credit system. Use Cases for CBDCs It's important to balance the potential benefits of CBDCs with concerns related to individual privacy and governmental control. This is highlighted by China's social credit system. The China social credit system is a broad regulatory framework intended to report on the ‘trustworthiness’ of individuals, corporations, and governmental entities across China [6] . China’s “Social Credit System” rates its citizens based on their behaviors, and those who score well get privileges; those who score poorly do not. A citizen with a high score is likely to enjoy various privileges—high-speed internet, the ability to travel freely, access to the best restaurants, golf courses and nightclubs—that fellow citizens do not [7] . There are many ways to lose points and lower one’s social credit score, depending on the city where the offense takes place. Some of the more trivial score-lowering actions include: not visiting their parents on a frequent basis, jaywalking, walking a dog without putting it on a leash, smoking in a non-smoking zone, and cheating in online videogames [6] . A citizen with a poor social credit may experience one of these forms of punishment [6] : Travel bans Reports in 2019 indicated that 23 million people have been blacklisted from traveling by plane or train due to low social credit ratings maintained through China’s National Public Credit Information Center [6] . School bans The social credit score may prevent students from attending certain universities or schools if their parents have a poor social credit rating. For example, in 2018 a student was denied entry to University due to their father’s presence on a debtor blacklist [6] . Reduced employment prospects Employers will be able to consult blacklists when making their employment decisions. In addition, it is possible that some positions, such as government jobs, will be restricted to individuals who meet a certain social credit rating [6] . Increased scrutiny Businesses with poor scores may be subject to more audits or government inspections [6] . Public shaming In many cases, regulators have encouraged the ‘naming and shaming’ of individuals presented on blacklists. In addition, flow-on effects may make it difficult for businesses with low scores to build relationships with local partners who can be negatively impacted by their partnership [6] . CBDCs can also allow the government to be more targeted in their efforts to manage economic growth. One such case is the ability to combat inflation effectively. With the flexibility of CBDCs, central banks can implement different interest rates on specific balances or accounts, allowing for more precise monetary policy implementation. CBDCs also have the potential to support targeted stimulus efforts by directing funds to designated sectors or implementing expiration dates to encourage spending [8] . Implementation Timelines The timeline for CBDC implementation varies by country. In the United States, the Federal Reserve is already taking steps to address transaction inefficiencies by launching the FedNow digital payments system by the end of July 2023. This system aims to provide low-cost bill payments, money transfers, paychecks, government disbursements, and other consumer activities [9] . Time will tell when this will be fully implemented in the United States, but many see the implementation of FedNow as the first step toward a CBDC. Globally, a recent survey suggests that by 2030, approximately 24 central banks will have implemented digital currencies. This projection highlights the increasing global adoption and recognition of CBDCs as a fundamental part of future financial systems [10] . It is not a foregone conclusion that CBDCs will be implemented as there is plenty of opposition to the idea. Senator Cruz from Texas and Governor DeSantis from Florida have both introduced legislation to prohibit the Fed from establishing a CBDC [11][12] . If CBDCs take over the financial system, it appears there will be minimal options for those who do not want to participate in the system. Some of those options may include: using bitcoin that is established on a decentralized platform with options for privacy and anonymity, using physical precious metals like gold and silver, and/or exchanging value for value like in an archaic bartering system. Conclusion Central Bank Digital Currencies have the potential to revolutionize the way we transact and interact with financial systems. By leveraging digital technologies, CBDCs can offer reduced costs, increased speed, improved financial inclusion, and heightened security. However, careful consideration must be given to the risks associated with potential governmental control, privacy concerns, and technological stability. As countries progress toward a digital economy, CBDCs will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of money, transforming financial systems and enhancing economic efficiency on a global scale. The opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and may not necessarily reflect those held by Kestra Investment Services, LLC or Kestra Advisory Services, LLC. This is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific investment advice or recommendations for any individual. It is suggested that you consult your financial professional, attorney, or tax advisor with regard to your individual situati on. Sources: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-central-bank-digital-currency-cbdc https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/digital-dollar/ https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-central-bank-digital-currency-cbdc https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-21/eastern-caribbean-dcash-outage-is-test-for-central-bank-digital-currencies?sref=YMVUXTCK https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-world-economic-forum-cashless-society-false-cbdc-592718364311 https://nhglobalpartners.com/china-social-credit-system-explained/ https://fee.org/articles/china-s-social-credit-system-sounds-pretty-dystopian-but-are-we-far-behind/ https://financialpost.com/fp-finance/cryptocurrency/central-bank-digital-currency-inflation-fighters-best-friend https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/digital-dollar/ https://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/twenty-four-central-banks-will-have-digital-currencies-by-2030-bis-survey-2023-07-10/ https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-introduces-legislation-to-prohibit-the-fed-from-establishing-a-central-bank-digital-currency https://www.flgov.com/2023/03/20/governor-ron-desantis-announces-legislation-to-protect-floridians-from-a-federally-controlled-central-bank-digital-currency-and-surveillance-state/
By Tom Hermann (Chief Investment Officer) 07 Jul, 2023
The global economy is facing increasing pressures, and there are growing concerns about a potential recession on the horizon. Two significant indicators that have historically foreshadowed economic downturns are an inverted yield curve and Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) readings below 50. Over the past couple of months these two indicators have continued to point in the direction of an impending recession. In this week’s update, we will explore the historical context and significance of these indicators and analyze their current implications for the economy. Understanding the Inverted Yield Curve: An inverted yield curve occurs when short-term interest rates exceed long-term rates, typically reflected in the inversion of the two-year and 10-year Treasury yields. An inverted yield curve is often viewed as an indicator of a troubled economy because it deviates from the normal yield curve shape, where longer-term interest rates are typically higher than shorter-term rates. In an inverted yield curve scenario, short-term interest rates exceed long-term rates, implying that investors have lower expectations for future economic growth and inflation. This phenomenon has been a reliable recession predictor in the past, and suggests that the global economy is headed toward a recession despite the stock market trading near all-time highs 1 . The Fed chose to pause rate hikes during their June meeting, but many expect the rate hikes to continue in the future 2 . Persistently raising short-term rates in an inverted yield curve environment can increase the risk of an economic slowdown or recession. The inversion of the yield curve itself is often seen as a reliable predictor of economic downturns. By continuing to tighten monetary policy in this scenario, the Fed may unintentionally contribute to a deeper and more prolonged recessionary environment. PMIs Indicating Economic Contraction: PMIs, or Purchasing Managers' Indexes, are widely used economic indicators that provide valuable insights into the health and performance of various sectors within an economy. They are based on surveys conducted among purchasing managers in manufacturing, services, construction, or other sectors. The purpose of PMIs is to gauge the prevailing business conditions, sentiment, and trends within a specific sector or the overall economy. When a PMI reading falls below 50, it indicates economic contraction. The US manufacturing sector's recent contraction, raises concerns about the overall economic health and suggests a challenging road ahead 3 . The ISM Manufacturing PMI came in at 46 in June, down from 46.9 in May. This is the lowest reading since July 2020 3 . The manufacturing sector is followed closely due to it strong linkages with other sectors of the economy. Changes in manufacturing activity can impact supply chains, employment levels, and the performance of related industries. Manufacturing job losses can have a cascading effect on the economy, impacting consumer spending and business investment, and further contributing to the likelihood of a recession. Analysis of Current Economic Indicators:
By Tom Hermann (Chief Investment Officer) 30 Jun, 2023
Amidst upwardly revised GDP growth and declining jobless claims, underlying risks such as banks prioritizing financial stability and a decline in global manufacturing cast a shadow of uncertainty. In this week's update, we delve into crucial economic factors that are currently shaping the global landscape. By examining manufacturing PMI, banks' defensive stance, and the resilience observed in the US economy, we aim to provide valuable insights into the current state of affairs. Manufacturing PMI and Recession Signals The S&P Global Flash US Manufacturing PMI™ is a widely recognized economic indicator that measures the performance of the manufacturing sector. In June 2023, the PMI dropped to 46.9 [1] , raising concerns about a potential recession. The PMI measures the performance of the manufacturing sector based on surveys conducted among purchasing managers. It provides an overview of various aspects, including new orders, production levels, employment, supplier deliveries, and inventories. A reading above 50 indicates expansion, while a reading below 50 suggests contraction. This decline from 51.0 in May marks the lowest reading since February 2020. The contraction in the manufacturing sector is primarily driven by a slowdown in new orders and production [1] . Manufacturing PMI is an important indicator as it reflects the overall economic health of a country. The slowdown in new orders and production can be influenced by various factors such as changes in consumer demand, supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, trade policies, and global economic conditions. However, in this instance, the largest contributors are a drop in consumer demand and global economic conditions. Historically, there is a correlation between manufacturing PMI contractions and economic recessions. For instance, during the global financial crisis of 2008-2009, the PMI readings dropped significantly, signaling an economic downturn. Similarly, the PMI contraction in 2020 preceded the economic recession triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. This makes it an important signal for investors and businesses to monitor [1] . Defensive Posture of Banks Worldwide Banks worldwide have been adopting a defensive posture, which further signals potential trouble ahead [2] . A defensive posture means that banks are taking measures to mitigate potential risks and ensure financial stability. Specific actions can include increasing capital reserves, tightening lending standards, reducing exposure to high-risk assets, enhancing risk management practices, and diversifying their portfolios to minimize vulnerabilities. The cautious approach of banks reflects their awareness of potential risks in the economy. By adopting a defensive posture, banks aim to protect themselves from financial shocks, economic downturns, and uncertainties. This cautious approach contributes to overall economic stability by reducing the likelihood of systemic risks and enhancing the resilience of the financial system. When banks take this defensive posture, it becomes a greater priority to be fiscally stable than make loans - which are the main revenue source for banks. In my opinion, this is something to watch as many commerical real estate loans come due in the next 12-18 months. As interest rates have significantly increased over the past 12 months, it will be challenging for businesses to renew those loans which will negatively impact the banks and their revenue [3] . Signs of Resilience in the US Economy Despite concerns highlighted by manufacturing PMI numbers and the defensive posture of banks, positive news emerges from the US economy. First-quarter GDP growth has been revised up to 2.0% from 1.3% [4] , indicating ongoing economic expansion. The revision of first-quarter GDP growth from 1.3% to 2.0% indicates that the US economy is expanding at a slightly faster pace than previously estimated. This upward revision suggests stronger economic performance and reflects positive momentum. Additionally, weekly jobless claims in the United States fell to their lowest level since October 2021 [4] . The decline in jobless claims to their lowest level since October 2021 signifies a that the labor market is showing signs of resilience. In previous weeks we've discussed the impact of labor hoarding and how it could be affecting these weekly numbers. The revised GDP growth and the decline in jobless claims reflect the resilience of the US economy. However, it is important to note that the economy is growing at a slower pace compared to previous quarters [4] . The Federal Reserve's efforts to combat inflation may influence future economic growth. While positive indicators exist, rising inflation and external factors such as the war in Ukraine could impact the possibility of a future recession [4] . Conclusion In summary, considering the manufacturing PMI numbers, the defensive stance of banks, and the positive indicators in the US economy, the outlook for the next 6-12 months remains uncertain as we are getting mixed signals across the global economy. There are some encouraging signs for the US economy as the labor market appears to be resilient. However, there's an undertone of vulnerability that warns of potential risks that could lead to a sharper downturn if not carefully managed. Our Directional Portfolios aim to build a portfolio that will adjust with the business cycle. If you'd like to learn more, you can call or text at 678.884.8841 or email us at connect@findabundance.com . The opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and may not necessarily reflect those held by Kestra Investment Services, LLC or Kestra Advisory Services, LLC. This is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific investment advice or recommendations for any individual. It is suggested that you consult your financial professional, attorney, or tax advisor with regard to your individual situati on. Sources: https://www.pmi.spglobal.com/Public/Home/PressRelease/6e8efbfbddde43f29eb12c5193939625 https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2023/html/ecb.sp230302~41273ad467.en.html https://fortune.com/2023/06/26/commercial-real-estate-office-downturn-outlook-goldman-sachs-morgan-stanley-ubs-pwc-bofa/ https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-weekly-jobless-claims-fall-first-quarter-gdp-revised-higher-2023-06-29/
Show More

Schedule a Discovery Call


Schedule a Consultation

Share by: